RCs public previews

Forum dedicated to the alpha, beta, and RC versions
earlcw
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2019 2:37 pm

Re: RCs public previews

Post by earlcw » Wed Mar 06, 2019 2:16 am

Using RC25 for 2 flights noticed on the first that no decent was offered by ATC thought odd. But again on the second flight again no decent. I've provided the log file of the second flight.

CYYG YYG GOVAX SASIK CYQY

Short flight.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

toelg
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 12:09 pm

Re: RCs public previews

Post by toelg » Thu Mar 07, 2019 7:52 pm

Did a short flight with RC25. Regarding the altitude instrunctions there is the same beavior as at RC24 ( "Initial altitude flight level 180" / "descend 0 feet" ).
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

ntnll
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun May 13, 2018 12:32 pm

Re: RCs public previews

Post by ntnll » Fri Mar 08, 2019 5:52 pm

124thATCv2.0-a60RC26 available. Further fixes for "0 feets" issue, further minor bug fixed. Improved new SID and STAR restrictions function

vittop
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 7:50 am

Re: RCs public previews

Post by vittop » Fri Mar 08, 2019 11:32 pm

ntnll wrote:
Fri Mar 08, 2019 5:52 pm
124thATCv2.0-a60RC26 available. Further fixes for "0 feets" issue, further minor bug fixed. Improved new SID and STAR restrictions function
Hi Antonello. I just briefly tested RC26, C172 IFR within Seattle Area. First attempt to request KNOW TWR an IFR clearance KNOW->KNOW failed, I had no clearance even resetting plugin and trying to request it again and again. Thinking it had something to do with that airport (a NAS)

I then moved to nearby KCLM, asking KCLM Delivery an IFR clearance KCLM->KCLM , which was accepted. I took off, all ok until I switched to KCLM Approach. After a couple of messages, APP ordered me

124thATC v2.0-a60RC26 00:09:29: Communication: N172SP, descend 0 feet, altimeter 30.01,124th transition level 20

at line 6790 of Log.txt. I decided to descend sloooooowly and however not below 1500ft. ,but at line 20369 APP warned me:

124thATC v2.0-a60RC26 00:12:29: Communication: N172SP, you are 1500 feet above your clearance altitude, descend and maintain 0 feet


at that point I quitted the flight. Hope this test could help. Logfile is attached. Thanx.
bugReport.tar.gz
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

ntnll
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun May 13, 2018 12:32 pm

Re: RCs public previews

Post by ntnll » Sat Mar 09, 2019 1:16 am

vittop wrote:
Fri Mar 08, 2019 11:32 pm
ntnll wrote:
Fri Mar 08, 2019 5:52 pm
124thATCv2.0-a60RC26 available. Further fixes for "0 feets" issue, further minor bug fixed. Improved new SID and STAR restrictions function
Hi Antonello. I just briefly tested RC26, C172 IFR within Seattle Area. First attempt to request KNOW TWR an IFR clearance KNOW->KNOW failed, I had no clearance even resetting plugin and trying to request it again and again. Thinking it had something to do with that airport (a NAS)

I then moved to nearby KCLM, asking KCLM Delivery an IFR clearance KCLM->KCLM , which was accepted. I took off, all ok until I switched to KCLM Approach. After a couple of messages, APP ordered me

124thATC v2.0-a60RC26 00:09:29: Communication: N172SP, descend 0 feet, altimeter 30.01,124th transition level 20

at line 6790 of Log.txt. I decided to descend sloooooowly and however not below 1500ft. ,but at line 20369 APP warned me:

124thATC v2.0-a60RC26 00:12:29: Communication: N172SP, you are 1500 feet above your clearance altitude, descend and maintain 0 feet


at that point I quitted the flight. Hope this test could help. Logfile is attached. Thanx.

bugReport.tar.gz
Thanks vitto, I'll try to replicate them ASAP.
A.

stewy81
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2018 8:03 am

Re: RCs public previews

Post by stewy81 » Thu Mar 14, 2019 5:42 am

Tested RC26 KMKE to KMEM via UECKR5 DELHI DCT PXV BLUZZ2 While on ground no ATIS would play when tuned. Got to holding point of runway and got clearance to takeoff, then was told to climb to 36000 while still sitting on holding point. From then on the debug showed I should be on Tower but I went to center anyway and eventually got commands from it to stay at 36000 and eventually harassed to get down to FL230 while I was already descending 2000 f/m . No issues with SID or runway selection, STAR selection was fine too. I didn't get to see how it reacted to vectoring me because xplane crashed as I was approaching the STAR. looks like 124th ACC lookup was the last thing to execute in the log.

Bug report attached.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Post Reply